→Ask a Green!←

Here you can ask a Green what's really happening in the murky world of AusPol

  • 14th
  • February
  • 2013
“On this matter, we are partners and collaborators.” Tony Abbott’s remarks to Julia Gillard on the Act of Recognition are telling. The man who trampled all else (the environment, single parents, education, the economy, not to mention the general population who are dying for a legitimate alternative to the usurper) in his insidious sustained effort to topple the government has put his agenda aside to join with his apparent nemesis to recognise… indigenous Australians? I wonder if he means the city folk or “authentic” Aborigines. Clearly, the government and opposition have broader intentions than first appear. At face value the Act of Recognition and by extension the referendum which will be pushed and highly publicised by the government is a positive step towards reconciliation which removes the powers of racial discrimination already instilled and if you look no further it will make you feel like a good person to vote “yes” on constitutional recognition. But, if you do look further, you will find that this is a deliberate, bipartisan attempt to disenfranchise Aboriginal communities by bringing their laws, culture and, most importantly, their natural resources under the direct jurisdiction of the Australian government by power of a constitution which was forced on this land, and now, its original inhabitants.
Social movements have exploded globally over the past 5 years and Idle No More which began in Canada with a hunger strike has been able to generate mounting pressure on the Canadian government as its popularity increases and its message for indigenous sovereignty spreads. Australia, like Canada, has ignored and subjugated its original inhabitants, moved them off into pockets of their own land and pitted them against other Aboriginal communities to sell off their natural resources and as the pressure for change builds, it is only a matter of time before a movement rouses the Australian people. Idle No More might have been that movement and this act is only a deterrent to the indigenous in Australia who want recognition with substance, and a nail in the coffin for wider public support for meaningful sovereignty for Aboriginal communities. The question of who can provide “peace, order and good governance” is one that deserves to be thought about and a government that has historically disempowered and marginalised your people with genocidal intent is probably not going to be your first choice to make that call. If you genuinely want to step towards true reconciliation which recognises Aboriginal sovereignty, you will head into the coming referendum and you will write “treaty.” Sovereignty was never ceded.

“On this matter, we are partners and collaborators.” Tony Abbott’s remarks to Julia Gillard on the Act of Recognition are telling. The man who trampled all else (the environment, single parents, education, the economy, not to mention the general population who are dying for a legitimate alternative to the usurper) in his insidious sustained effort to topple the government has put his agenda aside to join with his apparent nemesis to recognise… indigenous Australians? I wonder if he means the city folk or “authentic” Aborigines. Clearly, the government and opposition have broader intentions than first appear. At face value the Act of Recognition and by extension the referendum which will be pushed and highly publicised by the government is a positive step towards reconciliation which removes the powers of racial discrimination already instilled and if you look no further it will make you feel like a good person to vote “yes” on constitutional recognition. But, if you do look further, you will find that this is a deliberate, bipartisan attempt to disenfranchise Aboriginal communities by bringing their laws, culture and, most importantly, their natural resources under the direct jurisdiction of the Australian government by power of a constitution which was forced on this land, and now, its original inhabitants.

Social movements have exploded globally over the past 5 years and Idle No More which began in Canada with a hunger strike has been able to generate mounting pressure on the Canadian government as its popularity increases and its message for indigenous sovereignty spreads. Australia, like Canada, has ignored and subjugated its original inhabitants, moved them off into pockets of their own land and pitted them against other Aboriginal communities to sell off their natural resources and as the pressure for change builds, it is only a matter of time before a movement rouses the Australian people. Idle No More might have been that movement and this act is only a deterrent to the indigenous in Australia who want recognition with substance, and a nail in the coffin for wider public support for meaningful sovereignty for Aboriginal communities. The question of who can provide “peace, order and good governance” is one that deserves to be thought about and a government that has historically disempowered and marginalised your people with genocidal intent is probably not going to be your first choice to make that call. If you genuinely want to step towards true reconciliation which recognises Aboriginal sovereignty, you will head into the coming referendum and you will write “treaty.” Sovereignty was never ceded.

  • 10th
  • January
  • 2013
recitation:

Bushfires burning across Australia are visible from Space

recitation:

Bushfires burning across Australia are visible from Space

recitation:

The Reserve Bank estimates that 4 out of 5 of all mining operations in Australia are foreign owned.

recitation:

The Reserve Bank estimates that 4 out of 5 of all mining operations in Australia are foreign owned.

recitation:

anarcho-queer:

nationalpost:

Threat level raised to ‘catastrophic’ as wildfires scorch 124,000 acres in Australia
Firefighters battled scores of wildfires Tuesday in southeastern Australia as authorities evacuated national parks and warned that hot, dry and windy conditions were combining to raise the threat to its highest alert level. Temperatures soared to 45 degrees Celsius in some areas.

No deaths have been reported, although officials in Tasmania were still trying to find about 100 people who have been missing since last week when a fire tore through the small town of Dunalley, east of the state capital of Hobart, destroying around 90 homes. On Tuesday, police found no bodies during preliminary checks of the ruined houses. (AP Photos)

Today was the hottest day in Australian history. The national average high was 104.6 degrees F. Tomorrow’s national average temperature is expected to be higher than today’s by another 0.1 or 0.2 of a degree. The extreme heat is expected to go on for another day or two.

The nation has suffered a week of extreme heat; heat that has shattered record temperatures while also sparking hundreds of bushfires.

Temperatures are continuing to rise and were predicted to hit 54 C. (129 F.) next week in the centre of the “dome of heat” which has covered the continent, rising off the charts, but is now believed not to exceed 50 C. However, in some places the temperature has dropped dramatically overnight but is predicted to climb up again. Due to the heatwave, 7 of the 20 hottest days in Australian records have occurred in 2013.

recitation:

The heatwave which has blanketed the entire Australian continent is also expected to continue into a second week.

recitation:

The heatwave which has blanketed the entire Australian continent is also expected to continue into a second week.

  • 16th
  • September
  • 2012

The problem with voting the party line

In Australia, in the Federal Parliament MPs are usually required to vote along party lines whenever any legislation is to be scrutinised. This practice is one of the most damaging, widely accepted abuses of democracy in our current system. There are two ways this disrupts our so-called democratic system that I can see; and probably a number of effects that I haven’t conceived yet. The first is the accepted denial of true representation at the Federal level of every single electorate in the country. Once an MP is required to vote along party lines or face the consequences, they are no longer considering the well-being or the opinion of their electorate for the simple fact that they are now forced to focus on their own as well as, always, the interests of their party. This gives rise to the second, the indoctrination of ideology within the party. Like an isolated, incestuous, lovecraftian family the “ideals” and “practices” of a good Liberal, National, Labor, etc. member are continually devoured and reprocessed to be devoured again. There is one simple solution to this problem and we already have a name for it; the conscience vote. When the Leader of the Party decides the issue is incredibly divisive they will allow a conscience vote and allow MPs to vote their mind (or preferably their electorate’s). Allowing the public to rally and lobby their elected representative to actually vote the way they felt would be a positive step towards a new truly democratic society. Why isn’t every vote a conscience vote?

(Source: recitation)

  • 27th
  • August
  • 2012
recitation:

Anarchist Ashfield HQ Evicted
On Thursday the 15th of March a massive 4 story squat in Ashfield Sydney was evicted by private security forces. For 3 inspiring and eventful months the building had been home to over 20 homeless students, workers and anarchists. The space had become a centre of anarchist organising and counter information, where many demos and actions were planned and countless zines, leaflets and posters were printed for mass distribution. Inside the HQ people were able to collectivise their dreams and begin constructing the microcosm of a free society within the shell of an old building. Everyone involved in the space had equal say in how the space should be used and put a lot of time and effort in cleaning and fixing the place up. The squat was named after a large sign on the building labelling it “The Ideal Corporate HQ”
Ideally the building could have been transformed into an open social centre, and we could have publicly announced our presence immediately with banners hanging down from the roof, celebrated with an opening party, created a public free shop, communal kitchen and free school. Unfortunately, due to Australia’s draconian trespass laws, and the lack of militant resistance, squatters have no legal rights. Any squat that publicly announces itself or is discovered by security or police, must generally prepare for an immediate eviction. Police have the right to evict, arrest and charge anyone squatting an abandoned building without even consulting with the owner. Despite these difficulties, squatting goes on, as long as there are empty buildings and homelessness there will be squats and squatters. There are over 120,000 empty residential properties in Sydney, not to mention the massive number of uncounted, empty commercial properties. Each of these spaces are an opportunity for those without shelter to take direct action for their own needs, without having to wait on an endless queue for state housing, or in one of the unsafe, prison like shelters provided by some charity groups.

recitation:

Anarchist Ashfield HQ Evicted

On Thursday the 15th of March a massive 4 story squat in Ashfield Sydney was evicted by private security forces. For 3 inspiring and eventful months the building had been home to over 20 homeless students, workers and anarchists. The space had become a centre of anarchist organising and counter information, where many demos and actions were planned and countless zines, leaflets and posters were printed for mass distribution.
Inside the HQ people were able to collectivise their dreams and begin constructing the microcosm of a free society within the shell of an old building. Everyone involved in the space had equal say in how the space should be used and put a lot of time and effort in cleaning and fixing the place up. The squat was named after a large sign on the building labelling it “The Ideal Corporate HQ”

Ideally the building could have been transformed into an open social centre, and we could have publicly announced our presence immediately with banners hanging down from the roof, celebrated with an opening party, created a public free shop, communal kitchen and free school. Unfortunately, due to Australia’s draconian trespass laws, and the lack of militant resistance, squatters have no legal rights. Any squat that publicly announces itself or is discovered by security or police, must generally prepare for an immediate eviction. Police have the right to evict, arrest and charge anyone squatting an abandoned building without even consulting with the owner.
Despite these difficulties, squatting goes on, as long as there are empty buildings and homelessness there will be squats and squatters. There are over 120,000 empty residential properties in Sydney, not to mention the massive number of uncounted, empty commercial properties. Each of these spaces are an opportunity for those without shelter to take direct action for their own needs, without having to wait on an endless queue for state housing, or in one of the unsafe, prison like shelters provided by some charity groups.

  • 3rd
  • July
  • 2012

Tony Abbott supporting the Carbon Tax… This is the Mitt Romney of Australia